Difference between revisions of "File talk:Stub.jpg"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Is this one better? --[[User:Tai|Tai]] 10:01, 10 October 2007 (CDT) | Is this one better? --[[User:Tai|Tai]] 10:01, 10 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I didn't make myself clear. By iconic I meant being shaped & over a transparent background. Did you see the one I made? --[[User:Reddick|Jon]] 10:08, 10 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I did, but that wasn't shaped & over a transparent background either. At least not with IE6. I do like it though. :) --[[User:Tai|Tai]] 11:19, 10 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ah, yes. Our old friend, IE6, who does not support variable opacity of PNG files. Welcome to the 21st century, Microsoft! ;) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Does IE7 behave yet, I wonder? --[[User:Reddick|Jon]] 11:46, 10 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:46, 10 October 2007
I like the pencil nub, but wish it were more "iconic" rather than photographic. Maybe we can find a use for this elsewhere. --Jon 09:22, 10 October 2007 (CDT)
Is this one better? --Tai 10:01, 10 October 2007 (CDT)
I didn't make myself clear. By iconic I meant being shaped & over a transparent background. Did you see the one I made? --Jon 10:08, 10 October 2007 (CDT)
I did, but that wasn't shaped & over a transparent background either. At least not with IE6. I do like it though. :) --Tai 11:19, 10 October 2007 (CDT)
Ah, yes. Our old friend, IE6, who does not support variable opacity of PNG files. Welcome to the 21st century, Microsoft! ;)
Does IE7 behave yet, I wonder? --Jon 11:46, 10 October 2007 (CDT)
