Talk:Main Page - Revision history

Reddick at 23:59, 18 February 2011

2011-02-18T23:59:30Z

213.129.107.121: /* Hi everyone! */ new section

2011-02-18T21:00:37Z

‎Hi everyone!: new section

Reddick: Reverted edits by Acaxiqity (Talk) to last revision by Reddick

2010-11-22T15:11:41Z

Reverted edits by Acaxiqity (Talk) to last revision by Reddick

Acaxiqity at 08:13, 18 November 2010

2010-11-18T08:13:20Z

Reddick at 20:43, 1 September 2009

2009-09-01T20:43:49Z

Reddick: /* Centering */

2007-10-24T15:27:40Z

‎Centering

Tai at 14:18, 24 October 2007

2007-10-24T14:18:01Z

Reddick: /* Centering */

2007-10-23T15:14:23Z

‎Centering

Reddick: Talk:Bio moved to Talk:Main Page: revert

2007-10-23T13:16:26Z

Talk:Bio moved to Talk:Main Page: revert

Dookytester4: Talk:Main Page moved to Talk:Bio

2007-10-22T23:39:55Z

Talk:Main Page moved to Talk:Bio

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:59, 18 February 2011
Line 36:		Line 36:

	(smile) I wasn't knocking your choice, just knocking IE's poor support for web standards. They got pretty comfortable being the 500 lb. gorilla in the early 90's and then got complacent, feeling they didn't need to adopt evolving web standards. So when other more aggressively-updated browsers did update, they were perceived as being "broken" when it was IE that just wasn't compliant. --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 10:27, 24 October 2007 (CDT)		(smile) I wasn't knocking your choice, just knocking IE's poor support for web standards. They got pretty comfortable being the 500 lb. gorilla in the early 90's and then got complacent, feeling they didn't need to adopt evolving web standards. So when other more aggressively-updated browsers did update, they were perceived as being "broken" when it was IE that just wasn't compliant. --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 10:27, 24 October 2007 (CDT)
−
−	~~==What Could This Be For?==~~
−	~~Jon - jr47TijM~~
−
−	~~== Hi everyone! ==~~
−
−	~~I wished to thanks for this great learn!! I positively enjoying every little bit of it I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post~~
−	I do know this isn’t precisely on subject, but i have a site utilizing the same program as well and i get troubles with my feedback displaying. is there a setting i am lacking? it’s potential you might assist me out? thanx.
−	~~What i find difficult is to discover a blog that can seize me for a minute however your weblog is different. Bravo.~~
−	Hi there intelligent points.. now why didn't i consider those? Off topic barely, is that this web page sample merely from an strange set up or else do you use a personalized template. I exploit a webpage i’m searching for to enhance and effectively the visuals is likely one of many key issues to complete on my list.
−	Hey – nice weblog, simply looking round some blogs, seems a pretty good platform You Are using. I’m presently utilizing Drupal for a number of of my sites however looking to change one of them over to a platform very much the identical to yours as a trial run. Something in particular you would suggest about it?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:00, 18 February 2011
Line 39:		Line 39:
	==What Could This Be For?==		==What Could This Be For?==
	Jon - jr47TijM		Jon - jr47TijM
		+
		+	== Hi everyone! ==
		+
		+	I wished to thanks for this great learn!! I positively enjoying every little bit of it I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post
		+	I do know this isn’t precisely on subject, but i have a site utilizing the same program as well and i get troubles with my feedback displaying. is there a setting i am lacking? it’s potential you might assist me out? thanx.
		+	What i find difficult is to discover a blog that can seize me for a minute however your weblog is different. Bravo.
		+	Hi there intelligent points.. now why didn't i consider those? Off topic barely, is that this web page sample merely from an strange set up or else do you use a personalized template. I exploit a webpage i’m searching for to enhance and effectively the visuals is likely one of many key issues to complete on my list.
		+	Hey – nice weblog, simply looking round some blogs, seems a pretty good platform You Are using. I’m presently utilizing Drupal for a number of of my sites however looking to change one of them over to a platform very much the identical to yours as a trial run. Something in particular you would suggest about it?

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
->==Disambig Template==
+==Disambig Template==
-Do you already have a disambiguation template loaded?  If not, might it be time for one?  I'm specifically thinking of search terms like &quot;Khai Tam,&quot; &quot;Reddick,&quot; &quot;McNulty,&quot; etc.  Thoughts? --[[User:Tai|Tai]] 10:36, 24 September 2007 (CDT)
+Do you already have a disambiguation template loaded?  If not, might it be time for one?  I'm specifically thinking of search terms like "Khai Tam," "Reddick," "McNulty," etc.  Thoughts? --[[User:Tai|Tai]] 10:36, 24 September 2007 (CDT)
 These may be useful: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Otheruses here] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:For here]. --[[User:Reddick|Jon]] 12:30, 24 September 2007 (CDT)
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Indeed.  But I have no idea how to load or use templates.  I was guessing you had to load them as the official Keeper of the Wiki.  I suppose I should read up on Wikipedia about how to use them, eh?  Where do you get your Wiki know-how?  --[[User:Tai|Tai]] 13:56, 24 September 2007 (CDT)
-Heh.  I get my wiki know-how by going to Google and typing &quot;mediawiki ''thing-I-don't-understand''&quot; and looking for the hits at the official mediawiki.org homesite.  We're only using templates right now as static variables, but they can also accept variables before spitting out their content.  If you are editing a page and scroll to the bottom of the edit page, you'll see what templates are in use and how to edit them.  You can create them in the same way.  Like for &quot;bluebox&quot; I just typed &quot;Template:bluebox&quot; into the search window.  It didn't exist, so it let me create it.  Now I just insert &lt;nowiki&gt;{{bluebox}}&lt;/nowiki&gt; where I need it and the bluebox style will get plugged in. --[[User:Reddick|Jon]] 16:07, 24 September 2007 (CDT)
+Heh.  I get my wiki know-how by going to Google and typing "mediawiki ''thing-I-don't-understand''" and looking for the hits at the official mediawiki.org homesite.  We're only using templates right now as static variables, but they can also accept variables before spitting out their content.  If you are editing a page and scroll to the bottom of the edit page, you'll see what templates are in use and how to edit them.  You can create them in the same way.  Like for "bluebox" I just typed "Template:bluebox" into the search window.  It didn't exist, so it let me create it.  Now I just insert <nowiki>{{bluebox}}</nowiki> where I need it and the bluebox style will get plugged in. --[[User:Reddick|Jon]] 16:07, 24 September 2007 (CDT)
 ==More formatting & Lists==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-==Disambig Template==
+>==Disambig Template==
-Do you already have a disambiguation template loaded?  If not, might it be time for one?  I'm specifically thinking of search terms like "Khai Tam," "Reddick," "McNulty," etc.  Thoughts? --[[User:Tai|Tai]] 10:36, 24 September 2007 (CDT)
+Do you already have a disambiguation template loaded?  If not, might it be time for one?  I'm specifically thinking of search terms like &quot;Khai Tam,&quot; &quot;Reddick,&quot; &quot;McNulty,&quot; etc.  Thoughts? --[[User:Tai|Tai]] 10:36, 24 September 2007 (CDT)
 These may be useful: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Otheruses here] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:For here]. --[[User:Reddick|Jon]] 12:30, 24 September 2007 (CDT)
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Indeed.  But I have no idea how to load or use templates.  I was guessing you had to load them as the official Keeper of the Wiki.  I suppose I should read up on Wikipedia about how to use them, eh?  Where do you get your Wiki know-how?  --[[User:Tai|Tai]] 13:56, 24 September 2007 (CDT)
-Heh.  I get my wiki know-how by going to Google and typing "mediawiki ''thing-I-don't-understand''" and looking for the hits at the official mediawiki.org homesite.  We're only using templates right now as static variables, but they can also accept variables before spitting out their content.  If you are editing a page and scroll to the bottom of the edit page, you'll see what templates are in use and how to edit them.  You can create them in the same way.  Like for "bluebox" I just typed "Template:bluebox" into the search window.  It didn't exist, so it let me create it.  Now I just insert <nowiki>{{bluebox}}</nowiki> where I need it and the bluebox style will get plugged in. --[[User:Reddick|Jon]] 16:07, 24 September 2007 (CDT)
+Heh.  I get my wiki know-how by going to Google and typing &quot;mediawiki ''thing-I-don't-understand''&quot; and looking for the hits at the official mediawiki.org homesite.  We're only using templates right now as static variables, but they can also accept variables before spitting out their content.  If you are editing a page and scroll to the bottom of the edit page, you'll see what templates are in use and how to edit them.  You can create them in the same way.  Like for &quot;bluebox&quot; I just typed &quot;Template:bluebox&quot; into the search window.  It didn't exist, so it let me create it.  Now I just insert &lt;nowiki&gt;{{bluebox}}&lt;/nowiki&gt; where I need it and the bluebox style will get plugged in. --[[User:Reddick|Jon]] 16:07, 24 September 2007 (CDT)
 ==More formatting & Lists==

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:43, 1 September 2009
Line 36:		Line 36:

	(smile) I wasn't knocking your choice, just knocking IE's poor support for web standards. They got pretty comfortable being the 500 lb. gorilla in the early 90's and then got complacent, feeling they didn't need to adopt evolving web standards. So when other more aggressively-updated browsers did update, they were perceived as being "broken" when it was IE that just wasn't compliant. --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 10:27, 24 October 2007 (CDT)		(smile) I wasn't knocking your choice, just knocking IE's poor support for web standards. They got pretty comfortable being the 500 lb. gorilla in the early 90's and then got complacent, feeling they didn't need to adopt evolving web standards. So when other more aggressively-updated browsers did update, they were perceived as being "broken" when it was IE that just wasn't compliant. --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 10:27, 24 October 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	==What Could This Be For?==
		+	Jon - jr47TijM

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:27, 24 October 2007
Line 34:		Line 34:

	Looks great now. It wasn't my choice to use Internet Explorer - this is my work machine. --[[User:Tai\|Tai]] 09:18, 24 October 2007 (CDT)		Looks great now. It wasn't my choice to use Internet Explorer - this is my work machine. --[[User:Tai\|Tai]] 09:18, 24 October 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	(smile) I wasn't knocking your choice, just knocking IE's poor support for web standards. They got pretty comfortable being the 500 lb. gorilla in the early 90's and then got complacent, feeling they didn't need to adopt evolving web standards. So when other more aggressively-updated browsers did update, they were perceived as being "broken" when it was IE that just wasn't compliant. --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 10:27, 24 October 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:18, 24 October 2007
Line 32:		Line 32:

	Okay, I did some more (read: unnecessarily superfluous) centering/uncentering commands to my code to appease IE. Seems to look fine in IE7, you seeing it alright now? --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 10:14, 23 October 2007 (CDT)		Okay, I did some more (read: unnecessarily superfluous) centering/uncentering commands to my code to appease IE. Seems to look fine in IE7, you seeing it alright now? --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 10:14, 23 October 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	Looks great now. It wasn't my choice to use Internet Explorer - this is my work machine. --[[User:Tai\|Tai]] 09:18, 24 October 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:14, 23 October 2007
Line 30:		Line 30:

	What browser are you on? --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 11:52, 12 October 2007 (CDT)		What browser are you on? --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 11:52, 12 October 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	Okay, I did some more (read: unnecessarily superfluous) centering/uncentering commands to my code to appease IE. Seems to look fine in IE7, you seeing it alright now? --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 10:14, 23 October 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:16, 23 October 2007
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 23:39, 22 October 2007
(No difference)