Talk:List of Veterans - Revision history

Reddick at 03:24, 21 October 2007

2007-10-21T03:24:28Z

67.9.5.109 at 19:02, 20 October 2007

2007-10-20T19:02:39Z

Tai at 14:12, 7 October 2007

2007-10-07T14:12:38Z

Reddick at 11:31, 7 October 2007

2007-10-07T11:31:52Z

Tai at 03:39, 7 October 2007

2007-10-07T03:39:32Z

Tai at 17:46, 26 September 2007

2007-09-26T17:46:45Z

Reddick at 17:11, 26 September 2007

2007-09-26T17:11:26Z

Reddick at 17:10, 26 September 2007

2007-09-26T17:10:49Z

New page

So here's my theory on these people that (a) do have nicknames but (b) don't yet (or maybe never will) have biography pages. I say we link to a genuine biography page: <nowiki>[[Mark Donovan]]</nowiki>, but build the page to auto-redirect to the nickname.

That way it will make its way to the nickname for now, but if there ever is a bio, these links will already point to the right place. Sound good to you? --[[User:Reddick|Jon]] 12:10, 26 September 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:24, 21 October 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:

	Who put Raye as a private in the navy? Ther are no privates in the navy. It's an army/marine rank, not a navy rank. --Tai		Who put Raye as a private in the navy? Ther are no privates in the navy. It's an army/marine rank, not a navy rank. --Tai
		+
		+	I was writing what Raye was saying -- so ask her, I suppose. Sounds like she may get involved in the wiki, though, so she might be able to chime in herself. --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 22:24, 20 October 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 20 October 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:

	BTW, congrats on breaking 200 articles!!! - Tai		BTW, congrats on breaking 200 articles!!! - Tai
		+
		+
		+
		+	Who put Raye as a private in the navy? Ther are no privates in the navy. It's an army/marine rank, not a navy rank. --Tai

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:12, 7 October 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	I don't think so. The RWC is just a concept I wanted to establish, and you're already using it in context where it's needed. I don't feel the need to include it in titles. After all, if it's on the Wiki in the first place, it already has to do with RWC members, right? --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 06:31, 7 October 2007 (CDT)		I don't think so. The RWC is just a concept I wanted to establish, and you're already using it in context where it's needed. I don't feel the need to include it in titles. After all, if it's on the Wiki in the first place, it already has to do with RWC members, right? --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 06:31, 7 October 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	I was just thinking it was a way to distinguish personal lists from lists that include the whole RWC. See the list of universities I just put up as an example. If you don't want to use the RWC in the title, then should we take it out of the universities list title?
		+
		+	BTW, congrats on breaking 200 articles!!! - Tai

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:31, 7 October 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Jon, do you want to change the title of this article to "List of REDdimension Wiki Circle Veterans"? --Tai		Jon, do you want to change the title of this article to "List of REDdimension Wiki Circle Veterans"? --Tai
		+
		+	I don't think so. The RWC is just a concept I wanted to establish, and you're already using it in context where it's needed. I don't feel the need to include it in titles. After all, if it's on the Wiki in the first place, it already has to do with RWC members, right? --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 06:31, 7 October 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:39, 7 October 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Make it so! --[[User:Tai\|Tai]] 12:46, 26 September 2007 (CDT)		Make it so! --[[User:Tai\|Tai]] 12:46, 26 September 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+
		+
		+	Jon, do you want to change the title of this article to "List of REDdimension Wiki Circle Veterans"? --Tai

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:46, 26 September 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	That way it will make its way to the nickname for now, but if there ever is a bio, these links will already point to the right place. Just less work in the future and makes the structure more consistent. Sound good to you? --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 12:10, 26 September 2007 (CDT)		That way it will make its way to the nickname for now, but if there ever is a bio, these links will already point to the right place. Just less work in the future and makes the structure more consistent. Sound good to you? --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 12:10, 26 September 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	Make it so! --[[User:Tai\|Tai]] 12:46, 26 September 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 26 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So here's my theory on these people that (a) do have nicknames but (b) don't yet (or maybe never will) have biography pages. I say we link to a genuine biography page: <nowiki>[[Mark Donovan]]</nowiki>, but build the page to auto-redirect to the nickname.		So here's my theory on these people that (a) do have nicknames but (b) don't yet (or maybe never will) have biography pages. I say we link to a genuine biography page: <nowiki>[[Mark Donovan]]</nowiki>, but build the page to auto-redirect to the nickname.

−	That way it will make its way to the nickname for now, but if there ever is a bio, these links will already point to the right place. Sound good to you? --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 12:10, 26 September 2007 (CDT)	+	That way it will make its way to the nickname for now, but if there ever is a bio, these links will already point to the right place. Just less work in the future and makes the structure more consistent. Sound good to you? --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 12:10, 26 September 2007 (CDT)