Talk:Kevin McNulty - Revision history

Tai at 00:30, 28 February 2009

2009-02-28T00:30:40Z

Reddick: /* Laying Out Photos */

2007-10-08T11:46:40Z

‎Laying Out Photos

Tai at 04:09, 8 October 2007

2007-10-08T04:09:07Z

Reddick: TOC Padding

2007-09-28T18:14:52Z

TOC Padding

Reddick at 21:12, 24 September 2007

2007-09-24T21:12:28Z

Tai at 02:17, 24 September 2007

2007-09-24T02:17:44Z

Reddick at 23:51, 23 September 2007

2007-09-23T23:51:50Z

New page

==Excessive Bolding==
Want to get your opinion on style, Kev. I notice you're a fan of bolding almost every link, and I don't think its necessary. The link is highlight enough, I feel, and the bold actually makes it a little tougher to read, particularly when there are lot of them in a block of text. If we want to follow the accepted style of Wikipedia, they don't do that (but we never swore we'd follow that). Thoughts on the subject? --[[User:Reddick|Jon]] 18:51, 23 September 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:30, 28 February 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	Jon, can you please delete the history for "sanitizing" purposes? --Tai
		+
	==Excessive Bolding==		==Excessive Bolding==
	Want to get your opinion on style, Kev. I notice you're a fan of bolding almost every link, and I don't think its necessary. The link is highlight enough, I feel, and the bold actually makes it a little tougher to read, particularly when there are lot of them in a block of text. If we want to follow the accepted style of Wikipedia, they don't do that (but we never swore we'd follow that). Thoughts on the subject? --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 18:51, 23 September 2007 (CDT)		Want to get your opinion on style, Kev. I notice you're a fan of bolding almost every link, and I don't think its necessary. The link is highlight enough, I feel, and the bold actually makes it a little tougher to read, particularly when there are lot of them in a block of text. If we want to follow the accepted style of Wikipedia, they don't do that (but we never swore we'd follow that). Thoughts on the subject? --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 18:51, 23 September 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:46, 8 October 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	==Laying Out Photos==		==Laying Out Photos==
	Jon, I added some more photos to my page and I think it could look better, but I'm not sure how. Any suggestions? --Tai		Jon, I added some more photos to my page and I think it could look better, but I'm not sure how. Any suggestions? --Tai
		+
		+	I tried a little. I don't think you can go wrong with more pictures, though -- it only makes the story of you all that more captivating. Now that you have several photos, I shrank all body photos down to 150px thumbnails, and added another cleanbreak or two. Not sure I like the spacing of the baby picture, though. Looking good! --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 06:46, 8 October 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:09, 8 October 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Working with the starship infobox led me to find the code for increasing the margin on the TOC, which I've already done on your page and mine. --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 13:14, 28 September 2007 (CDT)		Working with the starship infobox led me to find the code for increasing the margin on the TOC, which I've already done on your page and mine. --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 13:14, 28 September 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	==Laying Out Photos==
		+	Jon, I added some more photos to my page and I think it could look better, but I'm not sure how. Any suggestions? --Tai

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 28 September 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	That's a great idea! Don't just depend on the random shit you see me do -- I'm too disorganized from page to page to be used as an example (other than bad!). I love what we're building here, and as far as I'm concerned you're an equal partner, so I welcome your help in establishing those guidelines. Here's a page where we can work: [[:Help:Formatting Guidelines]] --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 16:12, 24 September 2007 (CDT)		That's a great idea! Don't just depend on the random shit you see me do -- I'm too disorganized from page to page to be used as an example (other than bad!). I love what we're building here, and as far as I'm concerned you're an equal partner, so I welcome your help in establishing those guidelines. Here's a page where we can work: [[:Help:Formatting Guidelines]] --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 16:12, 24 September 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	== TOC Padding ==
		+
		+	Working with the starship infobox led me to find the code for increasing the margin on the TOC, which I've already done on your page and mine. --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 13:14, 28 September 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:12, 24 September 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:

	I was only doing that because I had seen you do it, especially with names. I have no problem with not bolding. Want me to stop? Why don't you make a page for the help section that's like a style sheet that says when the acceptable occassions are to bold or italicize (bold a movie or book title, italicize a TV show or magazine article, italicize foriegn words like ''nee'', etc.), how to name graphics, when to use a hyperlink, when to use an internal lik=nk (just the first time it appears on the page, or every time, or what), etc.? I'm good with whatever you want to do. --Tai		I was only doing that because I had seen you do it, especially with names. I have no problem with not bolding. Want me to stop? Why don't you make a page for the help section that's like a style sheet that says when the acceptable occassions are to bold or italicize (bold a movie or book title, italicize a TV show or magazine article, italicize foriegn words like ''nee'', etc.), how to name graphics, when to use a hyperlink, when to use an internal lik=nk (just the first time it appears on the page, or every time, or what), etc.? I'm good with whatever you want to do. --Tai
		+
		+	That's a great idea! Don't just depend on the random shit you see me do -- I'm too disorganized from page to page to be used as an example (other than bad!). I love what we're building here, and as far as I'm concerned you're an equal partner, so I welcome your help in establishing those guidelines. Here's a page where we can work: [[:Help:Formatting Guidelines]] --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 16:12, 24 September 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:17, 24 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Excessive Bolding==		==Excessive Bolding==
	Want to get your opinion on style, Kev. I notice you're a fan of bolding almost every link, and I don't think its necessary. The link is highlight enough, I feel, and the bold actually makes it a little tougher to read, particularly when there are lot of them in a block of text. If we want to follow the accepted style of Wikipedia, they don't do that (but we never swore we'd follow that). Thoughts on the subject? --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 18:51, 23 September 2007 (CDT)		Want to get your opinion on style, Kev. I notice you're a fan of bolding almost every link, and I don't think its necessary. The link is highlight enough, I feel, and the bold actually makes it a little tougher to read, particularly when there are lot of them in a block of text. If we want to follow the accepted style of Wikipedia, they don't do that (but we never swore we'd follow that). Thoughts on the subject? --[[User:Reddick\|Jon]] 18:51, 23 September 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	I was only doing that because I had seen you do it, especially with names. I have no problem with not bolding. Want me to stop? Why don't you make a page for the help section that's like a style sheet that says when the acceptable occassions are to bold or italicize (bold a movie or book title, italicize a TV show or magazine article, italicize foriegn words like ''nee'', etc.), how to name graphics, when to use a hyperlink, when to use an internal lik=nk (just the first time it appears on the page, or every time, or what), etc.? I'm good with whatever you want to do. --Tai